Showing posts with label television coverage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label television coverage. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

The graceful left-hander

And speaking of left-handers, it has also been long said that they are so naturally graceful that it is rare to find an inelegant left-hander. But that, thanks to the all-seeing eye of television, has proved to be a myth. More on that in the next post perhaps.

Thus ended my previous post. Here’s the next one.

When I grew up listening to radio commentary and reading cricket magazines, left-handers were always a pleasure to watch at the batting crease. Neil Harvey was described as somewhat of a ballet dancer in flannels, David Gower was grace personified, and even Clive Lloyd, while characterized as strong, was referred to as Big Cat, and the feline reference connoted its own image. And while the odd right-hander was described as elegant (Gundappa Vishwanath was right up there in this department), most of them were either technically correct (like Sunil Gavaskar) or brutally powerful (like Sir Vivian Richards).

So has the demands of the modern game made left-handers more utilitarian and less elegant? Or is it thanks to (or may be not) the ruthless eye of television technology, the scales are coming off our eyes? We seem to have become Gulliver to the televised world of Brobdingnag, conscious of every little detail and deficiency in the players. And no one has suffered more than the left-hander.

The Dravids continue to me “immaculate in defence,” and the Pietersens march on, murdering opposition fast bowlers with their brute power. So who is the most elegant left-hander in the world today? Saurav Ganguly? Ever watched him handle a short ball aimed at the ribs? You still call him elegant? Matthew Hayden? As elegant as a pugilist in leotards. Sanath Jayasuriya? With a nickname like the Matara Marauder, what would you expect? Name anybody else, and chances are your lasting image is an ugly swipe or an ungainly poke. So is the elegant left-hander an urban myth? A creation of primitive cameras and imaginative radio commentators?

On what turned out to be a related note, I had this conversation with a fellow cricket-fan at my office late last week, and we were trying to identify the most inelegant batsmen we have seen in action. The top three names that came out were Shivnarine Chanderpaul, Jimmy Adams, and Ejaz Ahmed – two left-handers in three. And Allan Border wasn’t far behind.

How television kills those pictures in our mind.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

The Cricket Wall

No, this is not a post about Rahul “The Wall” Dravid. Nor does it have anything do with stonewalling, that extinct (well, almost) strategy in test cricket.

The reference here is to Star Cricket, the new exclusive cricket channel from the espnstar stable. Ever since this channel has been launched, it has ended up serving as the wallpaper of my television when there is no other programming that any one else in the house wants to watch. So what if it is one of the meaningless Pro40 matches between Glamorgan and Derbyshire, filled with players you don’t recognize and scores that are dull and ordinary? So what if they keep showing the India tour of South Africa day in and day out? It’s cricket, after all.

If you not cricket-crazy, you may argue that this glut might make you lose interest in cricket, but then you are not cricket-crazy, are you?

For me, this is working out well. If there is nothing else to watch when I’m having dinner (or when I am confined to the house nursing a fever, like I was yesterday), pass me the Pro40. Did Glamorgan win? Or was it Derbyshire? Or may be the game was between Surrey and Essex? Does it matter?